A3A

Some Companies Are Reversing Automation. Should You?

Automation promised businesses a cleaner, leaner future: lower costs, faster service and fewer repetitive tasks.

But now, some companies are changing direction. Retailers are bringing back staffed tills, customer-service teams are increasing human support, and executives are taking a second look at processes that were previously handed over to software.

The lesson is not that automation has failed. It is that automation is only valuable when it genuinely improves the business.

“The future of business isn’t about doing more with less. It’s about doing what matters with more intention, alignment, and flow.” – Chais Meyer, business founder and consultant

For years, businesses were encouraged to automate almost anything that could be automated. Tasks that once took days could supposedly be completed in minutes, while software promised to reduce wage costs and increase efficiency.

But a process can be highly efficient from an internal perspective while creating frustration, lost sales or additional work somewhere else in the business.

So, should you reconsider your own automation strategy?

Here are some signs that you may need to.

Customers keep asking for human help

One of the clearest warning signs is persistent demand for human interaction.

Research cited by HubSpot and SurveyMonkey found that 53% of consumers actively dislike or hate AI in service interactions, while 82% would still prefer human support even if the outcome and waiting time were identical.

Five9 has also reported that 86% of consumers consider empathy and human connection more important than speed.

For businesses, this distinction matters.

Automation may look efficient on a spreadsheet, but if customers have to navigate a chatbot, menu or self-service system before eventually asking to speak to an employee, the process may be creating friction rather than removing it.

If customers consistently want a person, that is valuable feedback.

Your conversion rates are falling

Automation can also affect whether customers feel comfortable completing a transaction.

A study published in Management Science, which examined a credit union’s self-service loan approval process, found that offering customers the option to connect with a human loan agent increased the uptake of approved loans by 24%.

Interestingly, relatively few customers actually used the human-support option.

The presence of that option appeared to provide reassurance and confidence, particularly when customers were making an important financial decision.

That is an important lesson for businesses operating in areas such as financial services, healthcare, education or professional services.

When decisions involve money, risk or emotion, customers may value knowing that a real person is available, even if they never need to speak to them.

Your employees are spending their time fixing automation

One of the biggest hidden costs of automation is the work it creates when things go wrong.

If your employees are constantly correcting chatbot misunderstandings, dealing with exceptions, resolving incorrect transactions or calming frustrated customers, the automation may not actually be reducing workload.

Klarna provides a high-profile example of this tension. After promoting an AI assistant capable of handling large volumes of customer interactions, the company later acknowledged the importance of bringing more human involvement back into customer service.

The underlying principle is simple: technology can provide speed, but people provide judgement, empathy and context.

If your employees are spending their days rescuing automated customer journeys, it may be time to rethink where automation belongs.

Shrinkage, theft and abandoned sales are increasing

Retail provides another clear example of businesses reconsidering automation.

NBC News reported that Dollar General removed self-checkout from approximately 12,000 stores, while Five Below removed it from some locations identified as higher risk.

The issue was not simply a preference for traditional staffed tills. Businesses were weighing automation against concerns such as shrinkage, scanning errors and customer experience.

The same principle applies outside retail.

You may save money by reducing human involvement, but if the change results in more errors, lost sales, customer complaints, fraud, wastage or additional oversight, the saving may not be as large as it first appeared.

A lower payroll does not necessarily mean a lower overall cost.

Automation should improve the business, not just the process

None of this means businesses should abandon automation.

Used correctly, automation can be incredibly valuable. It can remove repetitive administration, reduce human error, speed up processes and allow employees to focus on work that requires judgement and creativity.

The key is knowing where automation adds value and where human involvement adds more value.

The best approach may not be automation versus people. In many cases, it is automation and people.

Let software handle the repetitive, predictable tasks. Let your employees handle the situations that require empathy, judgement, problem-solving and relationship-building.

Measure the whole picture

Before automating a process, businesses often focus on the immediate saving.

How many hours will it save?
How many employees will no longer be required?
What will the software cost?

Those are important questions, but they are not the only ones.

You should also be asking:

  • Has customer satisfaction improved?
  • Are conversion rates increasing or declining?
  • How many exceptions require human intervention?
  • Has the number of complaints changed?
  • Are errors or refunds increasing?
  • Are employees spending less time on the process, or simply doing different work to fix it?
  • Has the automation actually improved profitability?

These numbers tell you whether automation is delivering a genuine business benefit rather than simply moving costs from one part of the business to another.

So, should you reverse your automation?

Not necessarily.

The smarter question is not “Can this be automated?”

It is:

“Is the business better because this has been automated?”

If automation reduces costs while maintaining quality, improving customer experience and freeing your team to focus on higher-value work, it is doing exactly what it should.

But if it damages trust, reduces conversions, creates hidden costs or leaves employees constantly fixing problems, going back to a more human approach may not be a step backwards.

It may be the smarter business decision.

As your accountants and business advisers, BGR can help you look beyond the headline cost saving and assess what automation is really doing to your business. From profitability and staffing costs to operational efficiency and overall financial performance, we can help you measure the numbers that matter.